Confused about named.local semantics

[Barry Margolin]

In article <s44lljnmvm91 at corp.supernews.com>,
Terry Lee, Publisher <magic at area-net.com> wrote:
>I realize that my network seems to be working perfectly and that I shouldn't
>fix it, but it is driving me crazy which SOA and NS entries are correct for
>named.local on primary and secondary name servers for the zone area-net.com
>which uses ns1.area-net.com (12.22.230.1) & ns2.area-net.com (12.22.230.2)
>for name servers:
>
>IN SOA localhost.
>IN NS localhost.

The NS and SOA records for the 127.0.0 reverse domain don't really matter,
since no remote servers will ever query them.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.