Distributing DNS servers
Barrett Richardson
barrett at phoenix.aye.net
Sun Aug 29 17:58:48 UTC 1999
On 28 Aug 1999 peter at nospam.se wrote:
> Barry Margolin <barmar at bbnplanet.com> wrote:
>
<cut>
> : In article <Pine.BSF.4.01.9908270950530.19335-100000 at phoenix.aye.net>,
> : Barrett Richardson <barrett at phoenix.aye.net> wrote:
> : >
> : >I want to distribute my primary across a network topology for
> : >various reasons. I intend to have an ip address for the primary
> : >attached to a loopback interface on multiple machines at
> : >multiple points in my network (and use OSPF or BGP to establish
> : >reachability to various nameservers in various locations thru out
> : >the network).
>
> : We're doing a similar thing. If you traceroute to 4.2.2.1 from different
> : parts of the country you'll get a different machine. We're not doing it
> : with a looback interface, but with a virtual address on the ethernet
> : interface.
>
<paste>
> Mr, Margolin:
>
> I must confess, i do not understand the motivation for these schenarios.
> Please enlighten me (and maye others) why this is done, and
> what benefits are gained.
>
> Thankx
> Peter h
Notice how Mr. Margolin's replies appear beneath quoted text
to establish context, and items that do not pertain to a reply
have been trimmed? This is likely intentional.
Think "high availability" and "essential service".
Draft draft-ietf-catalone-hadns-00.txt may be worth a gander.
It (and others) are available for perusal at
http://info.internet.isi.edu/1/in-drafts
-
Barrett
More information about the bind-users
mailing list