[Kea-users] DHCP options order incompatibility

[Francis Dupont]

Steve Teusch writes:
> Any comments?

=> fix the client (or the entity which does not support any order for
DHCP options) as it is clearly not RFC compliant.
 BTW the option 82 RAI has a SHOULD to be last, and END/255 must be the
very last one possibly followed by PAD/0 simply because anything after
is ignored... So there is *nothing* else in RFCs about option order
and as far as I know it is at implementor choice (which is different
for ISC DHCP and Kea BTW).

Thanks

Francis Dupont <fdupont at isc.org>

PS: you can use a hook to pack options in your prefer order.