[Kea-users] "filename" vs "option bootfile-name"

[Patrik Lundin]

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 08:26:16PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> 
> Anyway, like I said I will accept the fact that kea considers "file"
> deprecated in favor of the boot-file-name option. It just means the
> autoinstall feature of OpenBSD needs to know about it as well.
> 

To follow up on this, the development branch of OpenBSD now has an
installer that is capable of picking up the filename from options
rather than the "file" field:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=147144203513174&w=2

However, upon reading the kea 1.1.0-beta release notes
(https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01417) yesterday I noticed something:
===
- Significantly extends the existing host reservation capabilities to
   include reservations of specific DHCP options, reservations of siaddr,
   sname, and file fields within DHCPv4 messages, and reservations of
   multiple IPv6 addresses/prefixes.
===

Does this mean you changed your minds and it is now possible to configure
"file" without having to write a custom hook lib for it? How come? Is it also
possible to configure "file" on a global level or only for a specific
host reservation?

-- 
Patrik Lundin