strange behavior of shared network
Milan Kovac
kovac65 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 4 11:04:07 UTC 2019
I think I found the problem.
There can not be defined range in subnet which is for static clients.
I will test it more deeply and will give results.
In any case, thanks a lot for ideas.
Milan
Dňa 2. 10. 2019 o 21:50 Simon Hobson napísal(a):
> Milan Kovac <kovac65 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a few routed networks each with 2 subnets ( public and private )
> ...
>
>
>> Here is dhcpd.conf
> ...
>> shared-network 001 {
>> default-lease-time 43200;
>> max-lease-time 43200;
>> # divina-private
>> subnet 10.64.0.0 netmask 255.255.240.0 {
>> option broadcast-address 10.64.15.255;
>> option subnet-mask 255.255.240.0;
>> option routers 10.64.0.1;
>> range 10.64.0.2 10.64.15.254;
>> }
>>
>> # divina-public
>> subnet 157.157.56.128 netmask 255.255.255.240 {
>> option broadcast-address 157.157.56.143;
>> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.240;
>> option routers 157.157.56.129;
>> deny unknown-clients;
>> range 157.157.56.130 157.157.56.142;
>> host Divinka-Uhliarik {
>> hardware ethernet cc:2d:e0:3f:fa:42;
>> fixed-address 157.157.56.130;
>> }
>> host Divinka-Obecny-Urad {
>> hardware ethernet 00:4f:74:31:b4:03;
>> fixed-address 157.157.56.131;
>> }
>> }
>> }
> You need to fix this to start with.
> Host statements must always be defined in the global scope - they cannot be defined in a lower scope as you have done here. Wherever you define them, they are always global in scope - but they can inherit options from where there are defined. This is almost certainly not what you want.
>
> So I suggest you fix this first and if the problem persists, then we can try and diagnose it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list