Option 82 is missing from Secondry lease file incase of failover

perl-list perl-list at network1.net
Mon Jul 2 15:10:49 UTC 2018


This is still a problem. It isn't that only the primary has the option 82 information. Its actually that the issuing server (the one that sent the offer) has the option 82 information in the dhcpd.leases file. The one that did not issue and received the lease via failover synchronization DOES NOT have the option 82 stashed in the dhcpd.leases file. I have stash-agent-options true; in the config file. 

> From: "neeraj jain" <neerajjain_iet at yahoo.com>
> To: "Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 5:55:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Option 82 is missing from Secondry lease file incase of failover

> hi,

> I am using the DHCP server in fail-over mode and my relay agent insert the
> agent.circuit-id information in the DHCP packet.

> This option 82 information is written into the Primary lease file after DHCP
> ACK. Ideally this option 82 lease information should sync between primary and
> secondary lease file.

> But after synchronization of the lease file I don't find the agent.circuit-id is
> written in the secondary file. Because of the OMAPI lease query fail from the
> secondary server.

> Thanks,
> Neeraj Jain

> --- On Thu, 12/5/11, Cathy Almond <cathya at isc.org> wrote:

>> From: Cathy Almond <cathya at isc.org>
>> Subject: Re: Option 82 is missing from Secondry lease file incase of failover
>> To: "Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
>> Date: Thursday, 12 May, 2011, 1:01 PM

>> On 11/05/11 10:30, neeraj jain wrote:

>> > Hi all,

>>> I am facing the below problem and knowing that this is the defect with the DHCP
>> > server. I just want to fix this problem.

>> > Can somebody help me to fix this problem or provide some pointer.

>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Neeraj Jain


>>> --- On Thu, 5/5/11, [
>>> https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=sthaug@nethelp.no | sthaug at nethelp.no
>>> ] < [ https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=sthaug@nethelp.no |
>> > sthaug at nethelp.no ] > wrote:

>>> From: [ https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=sthaug@nethelp.no |
>>> sthaug at nethelp.no ] < [
>>> https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=sthaug@nethelp.no | sthaug at nethelp.no
>> > ] >
>> > Subject: Re: Option 82 is missing from Secondry lease file incase of failover
>>> To: [ https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=neerajjain_iet@yahoo.com |
>> > neerajjain_iet at yahoo.com ]
>>> Cc: [ https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=dhcp-users@lists.isc.org |
>> > dhcp-users at lists.isc.org ]
>> > Date: Thursday, 5 May, 2011, 3:18 PM

>> >> Can somebody suggest that Why secondary is not having the option 82 information
>> > after lease file synchronization.

>> > Known missing feature. See for instance

>>> [ https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2010-May/011361.html |
>> > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2010-May/011361.html ]

>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [
>>> https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=sthaug@nethelp.no | sthaug at nethelp.no
>> > ]


>> What specific operational problem is this causing you?

>> Cathy
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> [ https://zimbra.network1.net/mc/compose?to=dhcp-users@lists.isc.org |
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org ]
>> [ https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users |
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users ]

> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20180702/4d28621a/attachment.html>


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list