DHCPv6 Vendor Options

[Jain, Saurabh]

Hi,

Is there a way to add multiple vendor options in DHCPv6?

Regards,
Saurabh Jain

From: Jain, Saurabh
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 4:36 PM
To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: DHCPv6 Vendor Options

Hi,

I am looking to add vendor options in my dhcpv6 server.  I am able to add a single instance of vendor option. However I need to support multiple enterprises and need to add multiple vendor options for that as follows:


option dhcp6.vendor-opts
12:34:20:da:
00:01:00:04:
12:23:45:67;

option dhcp6.vendor-opts
12:35:20:da:
00:01:00:04:
12:09:45:89

However version 4.3.5 after applying the below patch, server is responding with the vendor option but only the last configured vendor option. It is ignoring other vendor options.

How can I make server to configure so that it sends back the data based on the received enterprise Id value in the request/solicit packet.


Regards,
Saurabh Jain


From: dhcp-users [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org]<mailto:[mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org]> On Behalf Of Thomas Markwalder
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:23 PM
To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org<mailto:dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
Subject: Re: Issues in using User Class Option

Hello:

There was an issue introduced in ISC DHCP 4.3.5 which broke the server's ability to send dhcp6.vendor-opts.  This
has been corrected in our upcoming feature release, 4.4.0, due out Q1/2018:

- The ability of the server to send back dhcp6.vendor-opts values has been
  restored. A change in 4.3.5 (see #29246) which enabled it to send back the
  FQDN option unfortunately broke its ability to send back dhcp6.vendor-opts.
  Thanks to Sumant Gupta (sumantgupta at gmail dot com) of Landis+Gry for
  bringing this issue to our attention.
  [ISC-Bugs #46427]

It will be included in our next maintenance release, 4.3.7, but it's date is TBD>

I have attached a patch which corrects the issue for 4.3.6.

Regards,

Thomas Markwalder
ISC Software Enigneering

On 12/14/2017 04:33 AM, Jain, Saurabh wrote:
Solicit message from fe80::daf6:c8ff:feb0:8f15 port 546, transaction ID 0x336E00
checking against class Testsubclass...
data: option dhcp6.vendor-opts = NULL



P PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20180109/2b16daa5/attachment-0001.html>