Secondary in failover pair does not perform dynamic DNS updates

[Matthew Kassawara]

Neither stopping the primary peer (resulting in a
"communications_interrupted" state on the secondary peer) nor changing the
primary peer state to "partner_down" via OMAPI cause the secondary peer to
perform dynamic DNS updates.

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Simon Hobson <dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk>
wrote:

> Matthew Kassawara <matthew.kassawara at blinker.com> wrote:
>
> > If I simulate failure of the primary DHCPD instance
>
> Are you doing that properly, and putting the peer into partner down state ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20170404/141c436c/attachment.html>