Option 82 based static allocations mixed with dynamic allocations

[Patrick Trapp]

I don't find it all that complex or inelegant, personally. It works find for us here.
________________________________________
From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] on behalf of Eugene Grosbein [eugen at grosbein.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 9:46 PM
To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Option 82 based static allocations mixed with dynamic allocations

08.06.2016 3:44, Jason Lixfeld wrote:

> My hope is that the solution can be much simpler and more elegant
>  than having to add a 'ignore (or deny) members of CustomerOnPortX/X’
>  for each of those customer classes to the pool that allows members of “rgw01.lab”.

I've tried to solve exacly this problem myself some time ago and found there is no another way.

_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users