Why would addresses from a range not appear in the lease file
Patrick Trapp
ptrapp at nex-tech.com
Sat Apr 23 10:59:28 UTC 2016
Do both members of the failover pair show the same half of the new pool? I thought they were supposed to split it and assign from their half as long as their partner was up and running.
Patrick
On Apr 22, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Friesen, Don MTIC:EX <Don.Friesen at gov.bc.ca<mailto:Don.Friesen at gov.bc.ca>> wrote:
We included a new range in a secondary subnet, and only half the addresses appeared in the dhcpd.leases file.
shared-network "10_10_184_192" {
subnet 10.10.184.192 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
option routers 10.10.184.193;
pool {
deny dynamic bootp clients;
failover peer "PoBCdhcp";
default-lease-time 1382400;
option domain-name "hpr.for";
option domain-name-servers 10.10.208.196,10.20.202.100;
max-lease-time 1382400;
option ntp-servers 10.10.26.35, 10.20.250.35, 10.30.23.78;
range 10.10.184.202 10.10.184.215;
range 10.10.184.217;
range 10.10.184.219;
range 10.10.184.222;
}
}
subnet 10.10.200.224 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
option routers 10.10.200.225;
pool {
deny dynamic bootp clients;
failover peer "PoBCdhcp";
default-lease-time 1382400;
option domain-name "hpr.for” ;
option domain-name-servers 10.10.208.196,10.20.202.100;
max-lease-time 1382400;
option ntp-servers 10.10.26.35, 10.20.250.35, 10.30.23.78;
range 10.10.200.226 10.10.200.253;
}
}
}
Only addresses 1010.200.239 through 10.10.200.253 appear in the dhcpd.leases file, the others in the secondary range, 10.10.200.226 through 10.10.200.238 do not.
What would cause this?
Don Friesen
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users at lists.isc.org<mailto:dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20160423/d7c4df3a/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list