Client tied to pool via (sub)class in one subnet, same client has host declaration in other subnet...

[Sten Carlsen]

On 19/09/13 11.33, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2013, at 10:14, Christian Marg wrote:
>
>> subnet 192.168.65.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>   option domain-name "a.tu-clausthal.de";
>>   option routers 192.168.65.254;
>>   option domain-name-servers ...
>>   option broadcast-address 192.168.65.255;
>>
>>   host a.a.tu-clausthal.de {
>>     hardware ethernet 5c:26:0a:06:11:2f;
>>     fixed-address 192.168.65.128; }
>> }
> 	That "host" specification should be in global scope, not
> 	within "subnet".
The router comes from the other subnet, so the class seems to have the 
same properties of inheritance.
>
> 	/Niall
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users

-- 
Best regards

Sten Carlsen

No improvements come from shouting:

        "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20130919/1506cfe6/attachment.html>