agent.remote-id problem

[Sten Carlsen]

Just a crazy thought:

Could the "fixed address" statement be put in a subclass ?

If so, then one pool and many subclass statements should work?

On 27/09/11 14:57, Simon Hobson wrote:
> At 14:42 +0200 27/9/11, Matej Serc wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have searched many mailing lists to get this problem solved, but I
>> can't find any appropriate solution. The basic idea is to get a
>> static IP assignment to devices using the following clauses:
>>
>> host temp { option agent.remote-id "value"; fixed-address IP; }
>>
>> Currently we have mutiple pools (with size of 1 IP) and classes etc.
>> and would like to get rid of them.
>
> AFAIK, multiple single-address pools and classes are still the only
> way to do this.
>

-- 
Best regards

Sten Carlsen

No improvements come from shouting:

       "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!" 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20110927/d0a46418/attachment.html>