Old Tired Question: 'Not configured to listen on any interfaces'

[Matthew Causey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the insight guys.  This is very helpful (even the slightly
off-topic sub thread. :-)

On 2/24/11 1:24 PM, Glenn Satchell wrote:
> On 02/25/11 05:49, Simon Hobson wrote:
>> Matt Causey wrote:

<snip>

>>> What I did as a workaround was created a /32 subnet declaration for
>>> the ip address on eth0 so dhcpd would run.
> 
> You should use the proper subnet for this definition. It helps dhcpd
> build an internal picture of the network structure. Something like this:
> 
> subnet a.b.c.0 netmask a.b.c.d { }
>
What are the potential negative side effects of using:

subnet 10.26.16.55 netmask 255.255.255.255 { } (local server ip/32)

vs

subnet 10.26.16.0 netmask 255.255.252.0 { } (the /22 where server lives)

- --
Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNZ+WzAAoJEDdM1ngAf7fynzkH/RmFsePw4VaKbRh2S+WmtmQM
UuUqSdS7zHvesnh5+etroQhe5zPPtC+6DuaeXN72OeoKfZ5BcVTVfUrJGXkLv+ft
h58/Cpvw9d9YBIi9Ia+b/QZje5hL9YpUfcGQRKPavhZaZQHr2FdFE8AurEKmP5lp
rFbK5MW8dnUxA1WBvWwTaXgBXkLKPO9SecBWJyj3oeYFhLLM4g9HHkJqzRFWZXz1
QGXQkzK2PbvOSatPwpfYuVFS2tyeNerT6KL990HYygLqcuuHW2dRiNIShibUF70e
D3PL6JwKdCpYeQ6qnSs6kTYz1NAdO/tXy8oRa4oKkYIc8KUsE3qtUU4VONKZsmc=
=z79d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----