matching performance

Matt Jenkins matt at smarterbroadband.net
Fri Sep 24 00:53:32 UTC 2010


Hi Mike,

I have been playing around with this recently and could not see a 
noticeable difference.  I have been doing it the first way because its 
easier for my script to work with.

- Matt



On 09/23/2010 01:02 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> I want to match several clients and give them a different option.
>
> Is it better to do it this way:
>
> if option agent.remote-id=0A:00:3E:F0:5C:84 {
>   option domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
> }
> if option agent.remote-id=0A:00:3E:F0:7C:7C {
>   option domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
> }
> if option agent.remote-id=0A:00:3E:F0:6D:3E {
>   option domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
> }
>
> Or this way:
>
> if (option agent.remote-id = 0A:00:3E:F0:5C:84) or
>     (option agent.remote-id=0A:00:3E:F0:7C:7C) or
>     (option agent.remote-id=0A:00:3E:F0:6D:3E)
>   { option domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1; }
>
> I only ask because there could be a scenario where my "several" 
> clients becomes "several hundred".
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users



More information about the dhcp-users mailing list