dhcpd: failover peer pool-name: address not available
Bjarne Blichfeldt
Bjarne.Blichfeldt at bec.dk
Thu Jan 21 07:41:06 UTC 2010
Thanks for the response, really appreciate that.
I am positive I am using the same version 3.0.7 on both servers. Checked and double checked.
Also, nothing seems to be broken, the failover works as always.
I have been running wireshark and compared to previous traces and don't see anything different.
The logfiles contains the same messages except for the newly added : "address not available".
I have tried to start dhcpd both as "dhcpd -cf ll eth0" and "dhcpd -cf ll" - no difference.
Hm Spooky..
mvh,
Bjarne
-----Original Message-----
From: dhcp-users-bounces+bjarne.blichfeldt=bec.dk at lists.isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces+bjarne.blichfeldt=bec.dk at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Satchell
Sent: 21. januar 2010 07:57
To: Users of ISC DHCP
Subject: Re: dhcpd: failover peer pool-name: address not available
Are you running the same version of dhcpd on both systems? The failover
protocol in 3.0.x and 3.1.x are not compatible. Maybe the server upgrade
enabled the default dhcpd or something similar?
In server/failover.c that message seems to only happen when failing to
initiate the failover connection to the peer. So check the hostname
resolves to the correct IP address, and that you can ping the other host.
regards,
-glenn
Bjarne Blichfeldt wrote:
> Running dhcp on RHEL 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5
>
> dhcpd 3.0.7 ( not from distribution )
>
> After a seemingly minor upgrade to our RHEL linux server last Saturday, I see the following message in dhcpd log every 90 seconds :
> dhcpd: failover peer pool-name: address not available
>
> Since we don't update both servers at the same time, only the primary server was updated. There are no messages on the failover server.
>
> I thought the above message meant, that an address pool was missing from one of the servers, but the configuration files are identical on the two servers - except for partner addresses of course.
>
>
> Can anybody shed some light as to what the message means and where I should look ?
>
> Regards,
> Bjarne Blichfeldt
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list