No Free Addresses?
Sten Carlsen
stenc at s-carlsen.dk
Mon Dec 13 22:30:19 UTC 2010
Has the remaining server been set into "partner down" state?
On 13/12/10 23:06, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jason Frisvold wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> My Question: How can I tell why the dhcpd daemon ran out of free
>>> addresses? Is there a tool that I can use to scan the dhcpd.leases
>>> file and have it report the status of each IP? There are a lot of
>>> addresses and tracing the file manually is quite tedious.
>> Check this out. Works pretty well.
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/dhcpd-pools/
> Interesting. Thanks for suggesting that program. But it just
> confuses me more since it seems to confirm that I had plenty of
> address space available while at the same time saying that I had none
> to allocate. Here is what it says for me. At the time of this
> snapshot the dhcpd was unable to provide leases.
>
> dhcpd-pools -c dhcpd.conf -l dhcpd.leases.snapshot
> Ranges:
> shared net name first ip last ip max cur percent touch t+c t+c perc bu bu perc
> All networks 172.17.29.1 - 172.17.29.255 255 29 11.373 38 67 26.275 38 14.902
> All networks 172.17.30.10 - 172.17.31.254 501 147 29.341 0 147 29.341 0 0.000
>
> Shared networks:
> name max cur percent touch t+c t+c perc bu bu perc
>
> Sum of all ranges:
> name max cur percent touch t+c t+c perc bu bu perc
> All networks 756 176 23.280 38 214 28.307 76 10.053
>
> Hmm... The currently allocated was 147 out of 501 or 29% but at the
> same time the 'bu' field says 0 available for allocation. Working off
> of the live files with the extra pool space added it says:
>
> dhcpd-pools -c /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf -l /var/lib/dhcp3/dhcpd.leases
> Ranges:
> shared net name first ip last ip max cur percent touch t+c t+c perc bu bu perc
> All networks 172.17.27.1 - 172.17.27.255 255 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0.000
> All networks 172.17.28.1 - 172.17.28.255 255 24 9.412 1 25 9.804 0 0.000
> All networks 172.17.29.1 - 172.17.29.255 255 19 7.451 36 55 21.569 36 14.118
> All networks 172.17.30.10 - 172.17.31.254 501 137 27.345 0 137 27.345 0 0.000
>
> Shared networks:
> name max cur percent touch t+c t+c perc bu bu perc
>
> Sum of all ranges:
> name max cur percent touch t+c t+c perc bu bu perc
> All networks 1266 180 14.218 37 217 17.141 72 5.687
>
> Obviously it is allocating out of the added pool. But at the same
> time the 'bu' field is zero meaning nothing available to allocate.
> That seems to be a basic conflict to me.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
--
Best regards
Sten Carlsen
No improvements come from shouting:
"MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20101213/ee58d739/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list