dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1

[Darren]

They were both configured and working correctly under 3.0.6.  I have  
narrowed it down to adding these configurations to the failover config  
as being the problem:

max-lease-ownership 1;
max-lease-misbalance 2;
min-balance 30;
max-balance 300;

I assume that these belong on both servers?  Or do they only belong on  
the master?  The manual isn't clear about this.  Removing these  
configuration directives seems to resolve the issue.


On Aug 27, 2009, at 02:19 , Berg, M. van den wrote:

> other thought: the name of the failover peer in de failover  
> declaration should be the same on both servers:
>
> failover peer "NAME" {
> ...
> }
>
> --
> Meindert van den Berg
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org
>> [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Darren
>> Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2009 17:17
>> To: Users of ISC DHCP
>> Subject: Re: dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1
>>
>> Indeed they were.  Any other thoughts?
>>
>>
>> On Aug 26, 2009, at 10:25 , Berg, M. van den wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thought: Both servers should run the same version dhcpd
>>>
>>> --
>>> Meindert van den Berg
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org
>>>> [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Darren
>>>> Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2009 16:11
>>>> To: Users of ISC DHCP
>>>> Subject: dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know if there are problems upgrading from 3.0.6 ->
>>>> 3.1.2p1
>>>> with the lease file format or perhaps failover issues in regards to
>>>> existing leases?  I was experiencing very strange behavior with the
>>>> servers such as only 50% of the leases would be handed out.  Both
>>>> servers were saying "peer holds all free leases" for the remaining
>>>> 50%.  I even tried nuking the lease file from the secondary.  The
>>>> secondary was recovering and the primary automatically entered
>>>> partner-
>>>> down.  Both servers were STILL saying "peer holds all free
>>>> leases".  I
>>>> have since reverted to 3.0.6.  Thoughts?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dhcp-users mailing list
>>>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ***************************************************************
>> ****************************************
>>> The NLR disclaimer (http://www.nlr.nl/emaildisclaimer) is valid for
>>> NLR e-mail messages.
>>>
>> ***************************************************************
>> ****************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dhcp-users mailing list
>>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
> The NLR disclaimer (http://www.nlr.nl/emaildisclaimer) is valid for  
> NLR e-mail messages.
> *******************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>