dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1

[Darren]

Indeed they were.  Any other thoughts?


On Aug 26, 2009, at 10:25 , Berg, M. van den wrote:

>
> Thought: Both servers should run the same version dhcpd
>
> --
> Meindert van den Berg
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org
>> [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Darren
>> Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2009 16:11
>> To: Users of ISC DHCP
>> Subject: dhcpd upgrade 3.0.6 -> 3.1.2p1
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Does anyone know if there are problems upgrading from 3.0.6 ->
>> 3.1.2p1
>> with the lease file format or perhaps failover issues in regards to
>> existing leases?  I was experiencing very strange behavior with the
>> servers such as only 50% of the leases would be handed out.  Both
>> servers were saying "peer holds all free leases" for the remaining
>> 50%.  I even tried nuking the lease file from the secondary.  The
>> secondary was recovering and the primary automatically entered
>> partner-
>> down.  Both servers were STILL saying "peer holds all free
>> leases".  I
>> have since reverted to 3.0.6.  Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
> The NLR disclaimer (http://www.nlr.nl/emaildisclaimer) is valid for  
> NLR e-mail messages.
> *******************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>