Memory footprint of dhcpd process steadily increasing

[sthaug at nethelp.no]

> > It hasn't been a couple of weeks yet - but the previous memory leak
> > trend was very visible, and is now totally gone. I think we can say
> > that this problem is solved!
> 
> Would 3.1.2 need the same change?  The code in failover.c is
> certainly similar.

>From a quick look at the sources, 3.1.2 needs the same change to the
code in load_balance_mine(). You should verify this for yourself,
obviously.

I know we definitely saw a memory leak of similar magnitude when we
used 3.1.0/3.1.1 *without* such a patch.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no