DHCP failover and fixed-address
Sebastian Hagedorn
Hagedorn at uni-koeln.de
Mon Mar 3 10:26:10 UTC 2008
--On 3. März 2008 21:11:34 +1100 Glenn Satchell
<Glenn.Satchell at uniq.com.au> wrote:
> That's eaxctly the right way to do it.
Thanks, that's good to know.
> In fact if you only have fixed
> addresses you don't need failover at all.
No, we have proper failover pools as well.
> Since both servers return
> exactly the same information, then it doesn't matter which one (or both
> even) reply to the client request.
OK.
> FOr newer releases you may be thinking of reserved leases.
Yes, that's what I meant.
> While these
> seem to work, the only way to enable them is by editting the leases
> file or a complex omapi interface.
So what advantage do they offer?
Thanks, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
.:.:.:.Skype: shagedorn.:.:.:.
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list