problem with 3.1.1 not returning router address

[Jeff Wieland]

David W. Hankins wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 04:04:28PM -0400, Jeff Wieland wrote:
>> Hmmm.  We had to back 3.1.1 out on some of our production servers,
>> as it was causing numerous clients to be unable to get a default
>> route.  There are these new Linksys routers for instance that show
>> the problem.  So you're saying that we can't get the beta yet, and
>> that we don't have CVS access?
> 
> You could probably work around this by over-riding the parameter
> request list trivially (and generically for all clients);
> 
>   option dhcp-parameter-request-list = concat(1, 3,
> 				option dhcp-parameter-request-list);
> 
> This enforces that the subnet-mask and routers options appear in the
> PRL that reaches the buggy code in that order; subnet-mask first, and
> should get you through until the next release.
> 

This doesn't seem to make any difference.  I'm still seeing the
duplicated subnet-mask and no router.
-- 
           Jeff Wieland            |         Purdue University
    Network Systems Administrator  |        ITN&S Data Networks
        Voice: (765)496-8234       |        501 Harrison Street
         FAX: (765)494-6620        |   West Lafayette, IN 47907-2025