Vista doesn't ack dhcp offer

[Todd Snyder]

I think Wireshark should work, no? 

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org] On
Behalf Of Doug Tucker
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 5:08 PM
To: dhcp-users at isc.org
Subject: RE: Vista doesn't ack dhcp offer

Was just looking around for something like that...the lack of tools of
this nature on the windows side is frustrating.


On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 13:48 -0700, Matt Cowger wrote:
> Do you have an equivalent sniff for the client side?  It might be 
> useful.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounce at isc.org] On 
> Behalf Of Doug Tucker
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:41 PM
> To: dhcp-users at isc.org
> Subject: Re: Vista doesn't ack dhcp offer
> 
> Well, yes, we are running iptables on the box as well...we use the 
> nocat package for redirecting the wireless clients to an auth system.

> I don't see anything unusual happen during these requests in the 
> tables output though fwiw, but, it's possible I guess to be the 
> problem...but even then, wouldn't we see the attempt in the dump?  It 
> literally looks like after the offer, it's dropped on the client side.

> Doesn't look like the client ever comes back?
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:55 -0700, David W. Hankins wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 01:40:50PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> > > http://engr.smu.edu/~tuckerd/dump.txt
> > 
> > These offers look correct to me, and what any client that sets the 
> > broadcast bit should need and expect.
> > 
> > Are you using any kind of l2 security technology, to limit address 
> > spoofing and so forth?  These sometimes trigger false positives and 
> > drop the server or client packets.
> > 
> > --
> > Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
> > Why settle for the lesser evil?
> https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.