Relay agents, NAT, and offers to giaddr
David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Fri Sep 15 21:57:59 UTC 2006
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:59:34PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Note absense of SHOULD/MUST language, although it is there for the DHCPNAK.
> (section 3.2, page 18, second paragraph).
RFC2131 is an unfortunate document in many places such as this.
But I think in this case it is universally regarded as a MUST.
I note that a clarification is not present in Barr Hibbs and Rob
Stephens' document:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-implementation-02.txt
There probably should be one.
--
ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email training at isc.org.
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list