Failover without shared-network?

[Ken Roberts]

On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 13:25, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Ken Roberts wrote:
> 
> >subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> >   # NO DHCP!
> >   authoritative;
> >   deny unknown-clients;
> >   option routers 192.168.2.1;
> >   host mercury       { fixed-address 192.168.2.11; hardware ethernet 
> >00:01:03:25:80:89; }
> >   host mars          { fixed-address 192.168.2.14; hardware ethernet 
> >00:01:03:25:6F:93; }
> >   # more host declarations...
> >}
> 
> Whilst not directly related to your problem, note that host 
> declarations are global in scope - so putting them inside a subnet 
> declaration is likely to cause you confusion sooner or later.
> 
> Simon
> 


Really?  OK, thanks for the tip.