Public Developer and Support Mailing Lists

Open source users helping other users

Below is a listing of all the public mailing lists on lists.isc.org. Click on a list name to get more information about the list, or to subscribe, unsubscribe, and change the preferences on your subscription. To visit the general information page for an unadvertised list, open a URL similar to this one, but with a ‘/’ and the list name appended.

List administrators, you can visit the list admin overview page to find the management interface for your list. This page is manually edited, in case of errors, visit ISC Mailman list overview.

If you are having trouble using the lists, please contact mailman@lists.isc.org.

Mailing Lists
Description
bind-announce BIND Announcement Mailing List
bind-beta-response Announcement and Discussion List for Participants in BIND Beta Programs
bind-users BIND Users Mailing List. Searchable non-ISC mail archive is here.
bind-workers BIND Workers Mailing List
dhcp-announce DHCP Announcement Mailing List
dhcp-users Users of ISC DHCP. Searchable non-ISC mail archive is here.
dhcp-workers DHCP Workers mailing list.
dlv-announce Announcement-only list for changes in ISC’s DLV registry
inn-announce INN announcements mailing list
inn-bugs INN Bugs Mailing List
inn-committers INN Committers Mailing List
inn-workers INN Workers Mailing List
irrtoolset Discussion of the inter-routing-registry toolset
Kea-announce News, announcement of new releases for Kea DHCP server
Kea-dev For discussion about Kea development, including proposed new feature design.
Kea-Users Discussion about installing and managing the Kea software suite for DHCP
moderators Discussion list for Usenet newsgroup moderators
noc-notice Notification List for Network Events
openreg-users OpenReg General Discussion List
survey-announce ISC Domain Survey Announce List
training-info Announcement-only list for ISC training events.

 

Most Popular Mailing lists

The archives of all the mailing lists are viewable by clicking on the list information page above. For three of the mailing lists, we also have Nabble Forum archives.

 

BIND-Users

Earlier
Hello, under important traffic average, raising up the options (-S) max-socks in named startup parameters, could help? Or it would be better to tune the (-n) cpus worker and the (-U) listeners? Thank you, best regards! /F _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: BIND-users Forum on Nabble
On 22/11/2017 14:12, Ron Wingfield wrote: > . . .well, I've received a lot of comment from several people, _most > quite helpful and appreciated_; . . .some rather critical and > condescending.  Regardless, I'll just pursue this resolve while using > other resources .  (BTW, under consideration, " > https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements> ".) > > Thanks again, [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: BIND-users Forum on Nabble
Am 22.11.2017 um 15:02 schrieb Ray Bellis: > On 21/11/2017 17:30, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> because of https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements and he >> should not have allowed this setup at all because "Minimum number of >> name servers - There must be at least two NS records listed in a >> delegation, and the hosts must [...]
Tue, Nov 21, 2017
Source: BIND-users Forum on Nabble
. . .well, I've received a lot of comment from several people, most quite helpful and appreciated; . . .some rather critical and condescending.  Regardless, I'll just pursue this resolve while using other resources .  (BTW, under consideration, " https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements".)Thanks again, RWOn Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:00 AM, [...]
Tue, Nov 21, 2017
Source: BIND-users Forum on Nabble
On 21/11/2017 17:30, Reindl Harald wrote: > because of https://www.iana.org/help/nameserver-requirements and he > should not have allowed this setup at all because "Minimum number of > name servers - There must be at least two NS records listed in a > delegation, and the hosts must not resolve to the same IP address" > > [...]
Tue, Nov 21, 2017
Source: BIND-users Forum on Nabble

 

ISC DHCP-Users

Earlier
Marc Haber wrote: > Can I have a blanket deny that applies to all hosts that are not > explicitly listed? How would I write that? Having to list a deny for > every host present on the network is explicitly what I'd like to avoid. "deny unknown-hosts;" does it in the IPv4 [...]
Tue, Nov 21, 2017
Source: ISC DHCP-USERS forum on Nabble
Hi, On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:17:57PM +0400, Brice Abba wrote: > -1- add a pool then to the network, resulting in a second "dynamic" IP address on _every_ host. I'd like to avoid that. > -2- Hosts with the fix address might then have two IPs from the same subnet, All host will have [...]
Mon, Nov 20, 2017
Source: ISC DHCP-USERS forum on Nabble
-1- add a pool then to the network,-2- Hosts with the fix address might then have two IPs from the same subnet,if you sont want (2) you can deny from the server dhcp-sol from partucular LLA (hots with fixed IPs)2017-11-21 14:36 GMT+04:00 Marc Haber :On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at [...]
Mon, Nov 20, 2017
Source: ISC DHCP-USERS forum on Nabble
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 02:29:28PM +0400, Brice Abba wrote: > This can help to fix this error message: > > Nov 21 08:54:59 chasse dhcpd[763]: Unable to pick client address: no IPv6 > pools on this shared network That's a negative, sir. Nov 21 11:33:25 chasse systemd[1]: Starting ISC DHCP Server for IPv6 [...]
Mon, Nov 20, 2017
Source: ISC DHCP-USERS forum on Nabble
This can help to fix this error message:Nov 21 08:54:59 chasse dhcpd[763]: Unable to pick client address: no IPv6 pools on this shared network2017-11-21 14:21 GMT+04:00 Marc Haber :On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:15:06AM +0100, Christian Kratzer wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Brice Abba wrote: > > > Hi Marc, > [...]
Mon, Nov 20, 2017
Source: ISC DHCP-USERS forum on Nabble

Kea-Users

Earlier
Owen Dunn writes: > It would be really useful for kea to have an equivalent to ISC dhcpd's > "not authoritative" but I can't find one from digging around in the source > code. => there is not (and BTW it is the subject of the #5184). > It would really help migration [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: Kea-Users forum on Nabble
Owen -- I've done likewise for us, but we're using U14 servers for our environment. A bit fiddly editing the checksums in the .dsc and making sure none of the vendor patches break things, but it builds well enough against sources from Git.cheers,KlausOn Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:25 AM, [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: Kea-Users forum on Nabble
It would be really useful for kea to have an equivalent to ISC dhcpd's "not authoritative" but I can't find one from digging around in the source code. It would really help migration to kea in environments where you already have DHCP servers giving out static leases and don't want to [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: Kea-Users forum on Nabble
v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} I’m using that setup as well: Pacemaker with a replicated postgres lease database. It works quite well. There’s only one missing piece: a way to keep the configuration in sync across nodes. In the database, perhaps? (aside: the configuration is quite fluid in our production environment, [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: Kea-Users forum on Nabble
Hi, thank you very much. With kind regards Sebastian Zayer Specialist IT Systems T: +49 2504 923 865 F: +49 2504 923 797 M: +49 152 21811579 Takko Holding GmbH Alfred-Krupp-Straße 21 48291 Telgte, Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Ulrich Eickmann, Thomas Helmreich, Alexander Mattschull, Arnold Mattschull Amtsgericht Münster HRB 8939 | Ust.-Id Nr. DE209094382 | takko.com Bitte prüfen Sie der Umwelt zuliebe, ob [...]
Thu, Nov 23, 2017
Source: Kea-Users forum on Nabble

Last modified: June 23, 2017 at 12:52 pm