DNSSEC regulatory requirements?
raf
bind at raf.org
Thu Apr 6 00:11:50 UTC 2023
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny at knipp.de> wrote:
> On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see
> > several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as
> > .de). Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some
> > kind of governing body at work here?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > -Josh
> >
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> at least not in Germany/.de. There may be rules for governmental domain
> names, but not for the general public/commercial domains. Other European
> ccTLD registry have/had promotions for DNSSEC, so this might be the reason
> for higher deployment rates.
>
> Greetings,
> Klaus
I think at least one Scandinavian country had a tax incentive
to encourage DNSSEC adoption, but no regulatory requirement.
cheers,
raf
More information about the bind-users
mailing list