Periodic SERVFAIL for TLD .BY

Dzmitry Shykuts dshykuts at gmail.com
Sat Apr 2 17:47:44 UTC 2022


I have some questions about this situation.

What causes this "address fetching loop"?
Maybe it's a bug/future in the BIND software?
Misconfigured .BY zone and its servers?
Problem with root servers or TLD?
Why does my server have this problem, but other servers don't?


пт, 1 апр. 2022 г. в 23:41, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>:

> Add a static-stub zone for .by which has the addresses of the nameservers
> for .by configured. This will break the stupid address fetching loop.
>
> The real fix is for .by to use nameservers that are directly in .by or
> ones thot don’t require a loop to get there addresses.
>
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
> On 2 Apr 2022, at 07:10, Dzmitry Shykuts <dshykuts at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Can anyone suggest something? Can someone tell me which server timeout? I
> would be very happy for any help!
>
> вт, 29 мар. 2022 г. в 17:02, Dzmitry Shykuts <dshykuts at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello! Can anybody help me with periodic and critical for me SERVFAIL?
>> Cannot determine the source of the problem.
>>
>> I have Debian 11.3 and BIND9 9.16.27 on it. There was no such problem
>> earlier.
>>
>> I do request:
>>
>>  <<>> DiG 9.16.27-Debian <<>> 103.by +trace
>> ;; global options: +cmd
>> . 518377 IN NS e.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS a.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS h.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS k.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS b.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS i.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS j.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS d.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS c.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS m.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS f.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS g.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN NS l.root-servers.net.
>> . 518377 IN RRSIG NS 8 0 518400 20220411050000 20220329040000 9799 .
>> keszTJZg3TCzY3s4UyinKYe7VwZGGf/8kHoWzJ2Ab3n4ctBt8gtleqC0
>> UZqIIjc9Ez9srWGGeNn2gRUtB65QvL99oX5gD5VI6h1SY81OC0HcBx2c
>> 80SZJ0s9qpNmkDDcp4EUNlgoheDkBAtB3MsIRIVA6T746gBthcVKLHxC
>> rpOy7ELdgDtHwtq8jL5QIFae6QlIGuO95nflzk31VoL/yhCxvpzIXEfq
>> QJlJQf21YJtAtYnY7vJJwuDVT20y/cj5W7PNxSkNLMoukqUXOeH/w2yB
>> 0yNkwbKLBZUkyrE5tQmlq5AnScofbT7ffOYB9o9ug39DgCTcqSeNZDYX 0Gekmg==
>> ;; Received 1137 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 3 ms
>>
>> by. 172800 IN NS dns5.tld.becloudby.com.
>> by. 172800 IN NS dns2.tld.becloudby.com.
>> by. 172800 IN NS dns3.tld.becloudby.com.
>> by. 172800 IN NS dns4.tld.becloudby.com.
>> by. 172800 IN NS dns1.tld.becloudby.com.
>> by. 86400 IN DS 495 13 2
>> 2D14284F8E47B53F839BD8068D438680B4B6C7A645769C9D89B47DF0 C5359B7B
>> by. 86400 IN RRSIG DS 8 1 86400 20220411050000 20220329040000 9799 .
>> IAk+oEOmuQVbb8RyxB9ML/GOwnLIaQdi0XMD8Y7san2AIx2lXeEZp3AV
>> fNgYQfTnVrGyi3ylXNkVmQXnqDdrPK8iJu6mKvmaI40sQwv8xDyx5Fnz
>> VaNHcY4+J3fQwSp+TrFxQuAlW3g3CFaUVNLk20V/TQUycVA75c+3TrW4
>> IQJ1aua0lDsG1JS7BigHryUH9Vy8nSyuikYOIiML0BTTTqFQN7yk4AiE
>> 3gbYMuCsMHQKfAIXpswc/i1eGEW7yi5USnQqza4P2YEDrUhSUps5N2u5
>> /UwdS1BsmW17WZRbfDudeL4y471jwKhYgCCycGI1whtToDA452nvDJL2 it6mlg==
>> couldn't get address for 'dns5.tld.becloudby.com': failure
>> couldn't get address for 'dns2.tld.becloudby.com': failure
>> couldn't get address for 'dns3.tld.becloudby.com': failure
>> couldn't get address for 'dns4.tld.becloudby.com': failure
>> couldn't get address for 'dns1.tld.becloudby.com': failure
>> dig: couldn't get address for 'dns5.tld.becloudby.com': no more
>>
>> Request SERVFAILed. When I do "rndc flush" several times, the problem has
>> gone for a while. After some time I get SERVFAIL again. Now I'm forwarding
>> the zone to Google DNS and there is no such problem.
>>
>> There is a some debug log from BIND of the problem:
>>
>> --
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20220402/7fb770fb/attachment.htm>


More information about the bind-users mailing list