Trying again on SERVFAIL
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Thu Feb 11 11:48:44 UTC 2021
On Thu 11/Feb/2021 10:44:58 +0100 Havard Eidnes wrote:
>> Still, being able to differentiate a local network congestion from a
>> remote bad configuration would help.
>
> That's true. There's
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-16
>
> which look promising, trying to make it possible to distinguish
> between the various reasons a recursor might choose to return a
> SERVFAIL response. It uses an EDNS option to communicate the
> additional information.
Commendable effort!
> As for its implementation status in general or in BIND in
> particular I'll admit that I don't know off-hand.
Yeah, by the time it lands on Debian's glibc we'll have grown a long long
beard. I'm still missing RES_TRUSTAD...
Best
Ale
--
More information about the bind-users
mailing list