Dynamic zone vs static records

Jérôme BECOT jerome.becot at inalco.fr
Mon May 7 14:56:20 UTC 2018


Hi, 

As you pointed out, it may be a convenient approach. 

Thank you for the advice. 

JEROME BECOT 
Ingénieur Système et Réseau 
DSIRN 
Bureau n°4.29 
Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales 
65 rue des Grands Moulins 
Paris 75013, France 

01 81 70 10 78 
jerome.becot @inalco.fr 
[ http://www.inalco.fr/ | www.inalco.fr ] 


De: "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.darcy at fcagroup.com> 
À: "bind-users" <bind-users at lists.isc.org> 
Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Mai 2018 20:42:59 
Objet: RE: Dynamic zone vs static records 



“ We are aware that we should not mix the plain text configuration with these dynamic records (and use a subdomain instead)” 



So, why don’t you do that? As far as I know, Domain Controllers still only maintain SRV records, so the “underscore zones” approach should still work. Make _tcp.example.com, _udp.example.com, _msdcs.example.com, etc. separate subzones, with Dynamic Updates allowed (for the Domain Controllers to add/delete/refresh their SRV records), and have the main zone (example.com) maintained by FusionDirectory. No need to get fancy with LDAP backends… 





- Kevin 






From: bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> On Behalf Of Jérôme BECOT 
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 9:49 AM 
To: bind-users at lists.isc.org 
Subject: Dynamic zone vs static records 





Hello, 





We are managing our DNS zone within LDAP through a 3rd party editor (FusionDirectory). This software is configured to export the LDAP configuration to plain text zone files, updated on the master (and a zone reload is made by the software by calling rndc). 





If we make this zone dynamic we have a serial issue because each server (Acitve Directory) dynamically updating the zone increments the serial which do not update the LDAP. Refreshing the zone via FusionDirectory do not work as the generated serial is lower. 





We are aware that we should not mix the plain text configuration with these dynamic records (and use a subdomain instead). As we want to edit the zone in LDAP and we would like to make the AD servers autoregister their record in the zone, would using bind with the LDAP backend allow us to do so ? (FusionDirectory can be configured as a simple LDAP editor without pushing text config). 





Let me know if my question is odd or lacking of information. 





Thank you for your further advices. 





JEROME BECOT 


Ingénieur Système et Réseau 


DSIRN 


Bureau n°4.29 





Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales 


65 rue des Grands Moulins 


Paris 75013, France 





01 81 70 10 78 


[ mailto:jerome.becot at inalco.fr | jerome.becot at inalco.fr ] 
[ http://www.inalco.fr/ | www.inalco.fr ] 

_______________________________________________ 
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list 

bind-users mailing list 
bind-users at lists.isc.org 
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20180507/e3e0b6c4/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list