delegation NS records

[email at ml.jacobdevans.com]

RFC2182 at least 3, recommends 5 - 7 

Thank You, 

Jacob D. Evans 

[ http://twitter.jacobdevans.com/ ] [ http://facebook.jacobdevans.com/ ] [ http://www.jacobdevans.com/ ] [ http://linkedin.jacobdevans.com/ ] [ mailto:sig-contact at jacobdevans.com ] [ http://serverfault.com/users/200560/jacob-evans ] [ https://github.com/jakedevans ] [ https://keybase.io/jacobdevans ]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Niall O'Reilly" <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie>
To: "bind-users" <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 2:40:49 PM
Subject: Re: delegation NS records

On 14 Jul 2017, at 14:07, bind at zq3q.org wrote:

> only a single **delegation** NS record
>     needed

Actually, there should be two or more, and their IP addresses
should belong to different networks.

RFC1034, section 4.1:

A given zone will be available from several name servers to insure its
availability in spite of host or communication link failure.  By
administrative fiat, we require every zone to be available on at least
two servers, and many zones have more redundancy than that.

/Niall
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users