BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools
Alan Clegg
alan at clegg.com
Mon Aug 24 19:30:14 UTC 2015
On 8/24/15 3:21 PM, nrgd at eml.cc wrote:
> Somehow all that ^ puffery translates into NOT wanting to allow the
> user to prioritize the use of forwarders the way they want?
You are trying to use forwarders in a way that they are not intended,
and is not a good idea. That is the translation of all of the responses
to this point.
All puffery aside.
AlanC
--
When I do still catch the odd glimpse, it's peripheral; mere fragments
of mad-doctor chrome, confining themselves to the corner of the eye.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 561 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150824/d52d9d57/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list