BIND9 Feature Request: 'fowarders' priority & round-robin pools

[Reindl Harald]

Am 24.08.2015 um 21:09 schrieb nrgd at eml.cc:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
>> So, if your link is saturated to the point that you can't hold up a VPN connection reliably, you fall back to an less-secure method of resolution?
>
> No.

YES but you maybe don't realize the impact of your idea

>> Non-deterministic security, what a concept!
>
> Didn't take long for you to resort to childish snark to did it?

not more childish than your feature request nobody ever would setup that way

>> Has it occurred to you, that you're giving the bad guys -- the ones that want to pry on your query data -- an incentive to also partially DoS your link, as a way to downgrade your query security?
>
> No, because I prefer not to waste my time with hypothetical/idle speculation.

why then the original post at all instead fix the root cause?

>> -1 on this feature request.
>
> I don't know who you are.  Is that an opinion, or a project decision?

an opinion

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150824/73d886a5/attachment.bin>