dig ignores +notcp when doing IXFR (DiG 9.5.0-P2)

Matthew Pounsett matt at conundrum.com
Thu Dec 5 16:29:10 UTC 2013


On 2013-12-05, at 01:37 , Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:

> 
>>> Note, named will for the use of TCP in its UDP response.
> 
> 	s/for/force/

Always? Regardless of response size?  Interesting.  What's the rationale for doing it that way?



More information about the bind-users mailing list