about the wild record
Warren Kumari
warren at kumari.net
Mon Oct 15 16:42:45 UTC 2012
On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Chris Thompson <cet1 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Oct 15 2012, pangj at riseup.net wrote:
>
>> no SOA for test.cloudns.tk IMO. see:
>>
>> PromatoMacBook-Pro:~ pro$ dig test.cloudns.tk soa
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.7.6-P1 <<>> test.cloudns.tk soa
>> ;; global options: +cmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 60320
>> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
>>
>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>> ;test.cloudns.tk. IN SOA
>>
>> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>> cloudns.tk. 300 IN SOA ns0.cloudwebdns.com. support.cloudwebdns.com. 1048
>> 7200 1800 604800 300
>>
>> ;; Query time: 860 msec
>> ;; SERVER: 211.136.192.6#53(211.136.192.6)
>> ;; WHEN: Mon Oct 15 21:13:04 2012
>> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 96
>>
>>
>> The SOA is presented in AUTHORITY SECTION, not in ANSWER SECTION, so it's
>> meaningless.
>
> Indeed, Warren's use of +nostats +ncomments to conceal that was
> disingenuous, to say the least.
Actually the use of +nostats +nocomments was to try not include detracting info, and I completly missed where the
the RR showed up...
But, gee, thanks for the implication…
W
>
> But you should notice that the above response - rcode NOERROR with
> an empty data section - is what RFC 2308 calls "NODATA", and not an
> NXDOMAIN. This is because test.cloudns.tk is an "empty non-terminal"
> in the name tree within the zone, and it is that which prevents
> *.cloudns.tk from applying to anything under it.
>
> --
> Chris Thompson
> Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk
>
--
Outside of a dog, a book is your best friend, and inside of a dog, it's too dark to read
More information about the bind-users
mailing list