better performance with 32 bit ! why?

[Michael Graff]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 6/29/11 4:28 PM, Sven Eschenberg wrote:
> P.S.: If all parts of bind were optimized towards multicore processing and
> the pattern of queries fits, yes, then the 8 core machine could probably
> outrun the 4 core machine, even when having a slower clock. But this might
> worsen the performance on single or dual core CPUs on the other hand.

We hope to improve this in 9.9 or at the latest 9.10, and have something
that can saturate all CPUs.  And no, we're not cracking RSA keys on the
extra CPUs just to keep them busy!

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOC6rwAAoJEDRzoY2A7tzbS9YH/2t6ohywrYjmX6xvg/Dshq5F
7cjirVvoE4jCarVREPWoL3vTAEUmehMccSIq6NRw9Uqb/Mrwa/UoNe9lN0D9r5zy
47trPsORG3kQW0T+znkO4zizlC4goKS4MBjasuXMKOYMtSizdi4pRBWBI6uaVgdG
fnGhPpK6s6bKFpH7labYnz32cBQW1P9FxyNV+aFgW/A8EJdhRbEMrTsbZHYFpoQO
mpVuvYoQOljCfjYhqpch/hsxdGdJO2w2XIqLpbWe4Etdt7OScuCbWfhmTnVrFP2Q
J6fcx2WmrHh5neOWkGe7jEanPBG6ajrMyBUZH5qClVQTYPYRu9TlRgti7RFCm3M=
=ndSh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----