slow non-cached quries

TMK engtmk at gmail.com
Tue Aug 30 01:27:55 UTC 2011


Dears,

Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server
have slow response time for the non-cached entries.

I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result

; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P2 <<>> @127.0.0.1 www.google.com +trace
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
. 2013 IN NS i.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS g.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS l.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS m.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS d.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS b.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS k.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS j.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS c.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS a.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS h.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS e.root-servers.net.
. 2013 IN NS f.root-servers.net.
;; Received 228 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 1 ms

com. 172800 IN NS a.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS b.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS c.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS d.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS e.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS f.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS g.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS h.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS j.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS k.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS l.gtld-servers.net.
com. 172800 IN NS m.gtld-servers.net.
;; Received 492 bytes from 199.7.83.42#53(l.root-servers.net) in 175 ms

google.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.google.com.
google.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.google.com.
google.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.google.com.
google.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.google.com.
;; Received 168 bytes from 192.5.6.30#53(a.gtld-servers.net) in 250 ms

www.google.com. 604800 IN CNAME www.l.google.com.
www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.106
www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.104
www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.147
www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.99
www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.103
www.l.google.com. 300 IN A 209.85.148.105
;; Received 148 bytes from 216.239.34.10#53(ns2.google.com) in 225 ms



we are running bind version "BIND 9.8.0-P2" on CentOS release 5.6 (Final)

the process is running as mutlithreaded and consuming total of 60% of cpu
utilization.

do we have network issue or performance bottleneck.

engtmk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20110830/17393257/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list