control channel protocol?
Klaus Malorny
Klaus.Malorny at knipp.de
Mon Oct 18 12:15:27 UTC 2010
On 18/10/10 01:16, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/16/2010 4:58 AM, Klaus Malorny wrote:
>> [...]
>
> It's virtually certain that you would get better results with less effort by
> switching to using dynamic updates.
>
>
> hth,
>
> Doug
>
Hi Doug,
well, I considered this, but as far as I understand, there are some non-trivial
problems with RFC 2136:
- can't create or drop zones -> still need to use the classic approach
- updates limited to a single message (64k limit via TCP), requiring
the updates to be split if need be -> problems regarding atomicity,
query integrity during update, serial numbers
also, this is only considered as an interim solution until Bind10 becomes
suitable for our needs.
Regards,
Klaus
More information about the bind-users
mailing list