CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
Steven Wilmot
steven at data-utilities.co.uk
Sat Apr 10 00:59:50 UTC 2010
Inline reply below
-----Original Message-----
From: David Forrest [mailto:drf at maple.maplepark.com]
Sent: 09 April 2010 9:28 PM
To: Doug Barton
Cc: Steven Wilmot; bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
>> Doug: I think it is a server error that is being reported because the
status is NXDOMAIN instead of the expected NOERROR.
>> Could you dig it again @primary-dns.co.uk with +norec and see if your
output then shows NOERROR?
As suggested in previous replies, it looks as though the problem is with
one of the following two possibilites
----
1 - The original server-configuration (or response) from "primary-dns.co.uk"
is NOT VALID
If this is the case, could you please help let me know exactly which RFC or
configuration that you believe is not valid.
Note: 'primary-dns.co.uk is owned and maintained by my ISP (aaisp.net.uk),
and I'm fairly certain that they would be quick to implement any
"corrections" if you were able to demonstrate a SPECIFIC bug
----
OR:
2 - The response from 'primary-dns.co.uk' is VALID, but the Microsoft-DNS
server is not interpreting this properly.
If this is the case, then I'm looking for help in identifying exactly which
RFC (or other specification) it is not implementing properly.
-----
Regards,
Steven Wilmot
Director
Data Utilities Ltd
More information about the bind-users
mailing list