BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"
Barry Margolin
barmar at alum.mit.edu
Wed Jan 28 04:41:26 UTC 2009
In article <glma06$8dd$1 at sf1.isc.org>,
Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews at isc.org> wrote:
> Liberal in what you accepts means don't die on arbitary
> input. You should still reject rubbish.
But MX pointing to CNAME is not "rubbish". It's a violation of the
letter of the spec, but it's very clear what is intended.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
More information about the bind-users
mailing list