BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT "Illegal"
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Tue Jan 27 17:01:54 UTC 2009
On 27.01.09 08:46, Al Stu wrote:
> So then you disagree that the following example returns a valid address
> record for srv1?
>
> srv1 300 IN A 1.2.3.4
> mx1 300 IN CNAME srv1.xyz.com.
> @ 300 IN MX 1 mx1.xyz.com.
>
> 1) Select Target Host:
> The MX query for xyz.com delivers mx1.xyz.com which is a CNAME.
>
> 2) Get Target Host Address:
> The A query for mx1.xyz.com delivers the address (A) record of
> srv1.xyz.com, 1.2.3.4, and also delivers the alias (CNAME) record of
> "mx1.xyz.com".
They are two queries. If mx1 would be an A, it would be returned in the
first query. Since it's a CNAME, the IP is not returned in the MX query.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list