Is bind right for this scenario?
Barry Margolin
barmar at alum.mit.edu
Mon Oct 8 12:16:41 UTC 2007
In article <fe9nd4$2qnr$1 at sf1.isc.org>, java97301 at yahoo.com wrote:
> I need to be able to have multiple urls which would look like
> customer1.mydomain.com, customer2.mydomain.com, etc . I would then
> get a wildcard ssl certificate that would handle all the
> *.mydomain.com. Then could bind be used to resolve *.mydomain.com to
> point to our individual ip addresses. Basically mydomain.com would
You can't use a wildcard DNS record for this, you would have to have
separate records:
customer1 IN A 192.168.0.1
customer2 IN A 192.168.0.2
etc.
> resolve to our machine and bind would resolve the customerX portion to
> 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.2, etc. Where my machine is virtually
> multihomed so that it has multiple virutal ip addresses associated to
> the one physical ethernet card. Then different instances of tomcat
> could listening to 192.168.0.1 port 80 and 192.168.0.2 port 80?
>
> Thanks for any advice !!
Should work fine as far as DNS is concerned. I don't know anything
about wildcard SSL certificates, though.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
More information about the bind-users
mailing list