Just how "BAD" is doing this?
Paul Vixie
Paul_Vixie at isc.org
Thu Aug 16 21:53:50 UTC 2007
> ARIN shows pointing to A.EXAMPLE.COM and B.EXAMPLE.COM . NIC
> has a "HOST RECORD" for both pointing to the actual IPs of 8.EXAMPLE2.COM
> and 13.EXAMPLE2.COM . When you do the lookup for the IN-ADDR.ARPA , you
> get back the 8.EXAMPLE2.COM and 13.EXAMPLE2.COM NS records.
that's bad.
> Ok, so I'm working on "moderately bad". :}
yes.
> Given that for "reasons", ARIN won't change the NS records to point to
> 8.EXAMPLE2.COM and 13.EXAMPLE2.COM, and I can't get EXAMPLE2.COM to reply
> with NS records saying A.EXAMPLE.COM and B.EXAMPLE.COM .... Is there some
> other majik I can do to take me either partially or completely out of
> "moderately bad" range?
no.
> ... I guess I was "lucky" previously.
yes.
> So, suggestions? (Besides either getting ARIN to change their records,
> or EXAMPLE2.COM to publish the domain with EXAMPLE.COM NS records to
> match...)
no.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list