Two More Questions on Hosting Three Domains on One Name Server
Ejay Hire
ejay.hire at isdn.net
Thu Feb 2 22:37:47 UTC 2006
Answering the reverse dns question, most mail servers look
at the following..
1. Does reverse dns exist. (75% of mail servers)
2. ... If I query the A record of what's returned, does the
ip match. (50% of mail servers)
3. ... Does the MX of the domain in the from address match
the ip? (.1% of mail servers, usually as part of a spam
scoring solution)
So you should be fine with this reverse DNS configuration.
-ejay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org] On Behalf Of Tom Naves
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:43 PM
> To: Bind Users Group
> Subject: Two More Questions on Hosting Three Domains on
One
> Name Server
>
> I am going to host three domains on my dns servers:
>
> mydomain.com
> mydomain.net
> mydomain.de
>
> The NS Record for each domain is:
>
> IN NS nameserver1.mydomain.com.
> IN NS nameserver2.mydomain.com.
>
> Here are the SOAs for each domain:
>
> mydomain.com. IN SOA
nameserver1.mydomain.com.
> dns.mydomain.com. (
>
> mydomain.com. IN SOA
nameserver1.mydomain.com.
> dns.mydomain.com. (
>
> mydomain.com. IN SOA
nameserver1.mydomain.com.
> dns.mydomain.com. (
>
> In summary, I am using the same master and slave
nameservers
> to host the
> three domains. I am using the same SOA and NS records for
> each of the three
> domains.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> I have another problem with the reverse lookup zones. All
> three domains are
> on the same subnet and all three of the mail exchangers
are
> on two hosts:
>
> mail.mydomain.com is on 192.168.40.20
> mail2.mydomain.com is on 192.168.40.21
> mail.mydomain.net is on 192.168.40.21
> mail2.mydomain.net is on 192.168.40.20
> mail.mydomain.de is on 192.168.40.20
> mail2.mydomain.de is on 192.168.40.21
>
> It looks to me that I cannot have a reverse lookup for all
> mail exchangers.
> So I will have reverse lookups for:
>
> 20 IN PTR mail.mydomain.com
> 21 IN PTR mail.mydomain.net
>
> and none for the other four mail exchangers.
>
> Should this be o.k.?
>
> Sorry for belaboring this, but I cannot find the
information
> andywhere. It
> appears, sigh, to come with experience.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom Naves
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list