Memory Leak in Bind 9?
Wes Zuber
wes at uia.net
Sat Dec 9 01:01:42 UTC 2006
Ok, good idea. I tried flushing the cache periodically all ready. I
will try some things and report my findings here.
Thanks,
--Wes
On Dec 8, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> We did do that on one of our name servers .. I even tried 9.3.3rc3. I
>> don't quite understand why this would start suddenly.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Wes
>
> Because your usage pattern changed. You can be running at
> just under the per-process memory limit for years then a
> slight change of usage will cause you to hit the per-process
> memory limit.
>
> Named has controls for raising the per-process memory limit.
> It also has controls for releasing memory earlier than it
> otherwise would. You should look at these and set them
> appropiately in named.conf.
>
> Mark
>
>> On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Mark Watts wrote:
>>
>>>> After using Bind for years with the same relative configuration we
>>>> started to see named stop responding.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the logs I see this:
>>>>
>>>> Dec 08 01:28:53.584 general: error: timer.c:603: unexpected error:
>>>> Dec 08 01:28:53.585 general: error: couldn't allocate event
>>>>
>>>> this is bind 9.2.2 on FreeBSD 4.4. I do see some other posts for
>>>> the
>>>> same issue on this list without and answer for FreeBSD 5.5.
>>>>
>>>> As I said this just suddenly started occurring. We have a
>>>> cronjob to
>>>> restart named twice a day to keep it living.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone have any ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> --Wes
>>>
>>> Upgrade to BIND 9.3.2-P2 and try again.
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Watts BSc RHCE MBCS
>>> Senior Systems Engineer
>>> QinetiQ Trusted Information Management
>>> Trusted Solutions and Services Group
>>> GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list