Fwd: Re: Odd problems trying to make use of libbind as a replacement resolver...
Brad Knowles
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Mon Oct 17 12:45:24 UTC 2005
Folks,
Sorry, I wanted to make a correction to my previous statement:
> BIND-4 was the second to worst "spaghetti code" mess that this industry
> has ever seen, and BIND 8 was probably the worst.
Turn that around. BIND-8 was the second-worst "spaghetti code"
mess, while BIND-4 was the worst. The development team that Paul
Vixie drew together around him did the best they could to clean up
the BIND-4 code, but there was only so much they could do. Which is
part of why BIND-9 was done as a complete ground-up re-write.
There is a page at the ISC website entitled "A Brief History of
BIND" at <http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/bind-history.php>, and
there is also some information at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIND>
and <http://www.serverwatch.com/tutorials/article.php/3497601#hist>,
among others.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list