Has this bug been fixed since BIND 9.3.0?
Dave Clark
bind-users at dollardns.net
Wed Nov 16 15:28:25 UTC 2005
It seems that switching from allow-policy to allow-update is not done
cleanly when you `rndc reconfig`. I had a zone that used allow-policy to
authenticate updates. For testing, I removed the key from the config and
changed the zone to an IP based allow-update and executed `rndc reconfig`.
However, when doing updates on the zone using nsupdate, I get a refused
response when attempting delete or add updates. Sending queries with only
prerequisites returned NXRRSET as expected. So then I restarted the server
and was able to do delete and add updates just fine. I tried starting out
with TSIG based allow-update and switching that to IP based allow-update and
did a `rndc reconfig` and that worked intuitively.
Has this been fixed in BIND 9.3.1 or the BIND 9.3.2 beta?
Do you need more details to reproduce the problem?
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noc Phibee" <noc at phibee.net>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:28 AM
Subject: Use bind with SSL ?
> Hi
>
> i have installed Bind 9.X on Mandriva Linux, no problems, that work's
> it's good.
>
> Now i want add 2 servers for secondary name server and i have two
> questions :
>
> 1- The Zone transfert Master to Slave can use SSL for crypt the transfert
?
>
> 2- Can i said to slave server of automatiquely add a new zone when the
> master
> notifiy a new domains ?.
> Actually, the master sent the notify and if i don't have add manually
> into the /etc/named.conf
> of the secondary, he reject it.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list