couldn't add command channel ::1#953: address not available
MJ
php at cyberia.net.sa
Mon Mar 14 11:30:29 UTC 2005
Many thanks Jim,
Actually why I am confused because of the following paragraph from the
"Admin reference manual", would you please shade some light on the last
two lines of this paragraph.
-------------------------------------------
Running the rndc-confgen program will conveniently create a rndc.conf
file for you, and also display the corresponding controls statement that
you need to add to named.conf. Alternatively, you can run rndc-confgen
-a to set up a rndc.key file and not modify named.conf at all.
-------------------------------------------
Thanks,
MJ
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Reid [mailto:jim at rfc1035.com]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:20 PM
To: MJ
Cc: bind-users at isc.org
Subject: Re: couldn't add command channel ::1#953: address not available
>>>>> "MJ" == MJ <php at cyberia.net.sa> writes:
MJ> Hi, Actaully the only packaged BIND version available on
MJ> sunfreeware.com is 9.2.3,
That's no excuse for running old code.
MJ> One question, I have seen named.conf of a
MJ> running name server "without any control statement" and the
MJ> admin of that server is using rndc, how it is possible?
It isn't. Without a controls{} statement, the name server will not set
up a listener socket for control messages. [How else could the server
know which port and key(s) to use and which client(s) were allowed??]
Therefore there will be nothing for an rndc client to connect to. The
admin may well be using rndc, but it won't be for controlling the
server that has a named.conf file that doesn't have a controls{}
statement.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list