New RR types?
Chris Thompson
cet1 at cus.cam.ac.uk
Fri Jul 29 16:35:16 UTC 2005
Radu "Ux" D. <raduda at itcnetworks.ro> writes:
> Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> > At 12:18 PM +0300 2005-07-20, Radu \"Ux\" D. wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, forget to mention that actually I am interesting in 8.4.x
> >> versions...
> >
> >
> > 8.4? No way. That line is basically defunct. You might get this
> > for 9.x. Heck, it might already exist for 9.x.
> >
>
> Yes, 9.3.1 knows that I am interested for (9.2.3 still misses APL). But,
> at least for the moment, the resolver is harder to be used for
> development than 8.4.x.Or am I wrong?
Is there any reason why you can't use the 9.3.1 nsupdate to send
updates to your 8.4.x named?
--
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk
More information about the bind-users
mailing list