dns entry for top domain name
John
foobaring at gmail.com
Mon Jan 31 23:54:19 UTC 2005
could this be why? im trying to cname it to another domain?
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 604800 ; 7 days
@ IN SOA localhost. info.localhost. (
34 ;
86400 ;
900 ;
604800 ;
86400 ;
) ;
NS localhost. ;
MX 10 mail ;
* A 192.168.1.2
foo.com. CNAME foo.dnsalias.com.
although it seemed to resolve..i just get this nasty error in my log
[ID 295310 daemon.error] master zone "foo.com" (IN) rejected due to
errors (serial 34)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:48:57 -0500, Kevin Darcy <kcd at daimlerchrysler.com> wrote:
> John wrote:
>
> >well.i do want to resolve <everything>.foo.com as well..thats why i
> >had the wildcard there..
> >
> >but like you said..the
> >
> >foo.com. in a 192.168.1.2
> >
> >line should resolve foo.com right?
> >
> >how come its not?
> >
> >as of now i can resolve blah.foo.com, but not foo.com
> >
> Are you sure you removed the correct line? We have A records at the apex
> of zones all over the place. See, for example, axlealliance.com.
> blah.foo.com, on the other hand, shouldn't resolve unless there's an
> explicit record for it, or a wildcard entry.
>
> Perhaps it would be useful for you to post your zone file.
>
> - Kevin
>
> >On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:23:36 -0500, Kevin Darcy <kcd at daimlerchrysler.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>John wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I'm trying to figure out what would be the correct entry in the db
> >>>file so i can resolve a top domain..
> >>>
> >>>ie..i want to resolve
> >>>
> >>>foo.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>what would i need to have in the file?
> >>>
> >>>i tried.
> >>>
> >>>* in a 192.168.1.2
> >>>foo.com. in a 192.168.1.2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>and that didnt seem to work for foo.com...it works to resolve
> >>><everything>.foo.com
> >>>
> >>>but what's the line i need to resolve foo.com itself?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The second line by itself should have been sufficient. One would only
> >>have the first line if one wanted the wildcarding behavior.
> >>
> >>- Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list