secondary NS for dynamic zone

[Barry Margolin]

In article <dobcvs$2gko$1 at sf1.isc.org>,
 Roman Mashak <romez777 at gmail.com> wrote:

> is it reasonable to have a secondary NS for zone holding dynamically
> changing IPs (that's dynamic DNS) ?

Yes, unless you really want DNS resolution to fail when your only server 
goes down.

Incremental zone transfers should allow the slave servers to keep up to 
date with the dynamic updates.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***